Mercurial > hg-git
view CONTRIBUTING @ 1021:17f64b9bfa62
git_handler: explicitly set default branch
In upstream c0b16b801687be26d14cabe501678e24b2a3c117 there was a refactoring
that caused current named branch to be set if branch wasn't specified. It makes
hg-git tests fail. This diff fixes it by explicitly specifying default named
branch.
author | Stanislau Hlebik <stash@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:49:23 -0700 |
parents | 06d523eb596a |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
The short version: * Patches should have a good summary line for first line of commit message * Patches should be sent to the Google Group[0] * Patch needs to do exactly one thing * testsuite passes The longer version: We use a variant of Mercurial's own contribution system. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ContributingChanges contains their full guidelines. Key differences are (by rule number): 1. For hg-git, I'm not strict about the "topic: a few words" format for the first line, but I do insist on a sensible summary as the first line of your commit 2. We don't require use of issueNNN for bug fixes (we have no robot) 3. Use the hg-git google group 10. We use mostly pep8 style. The current codebase is a mess, but new code should be basically pep8. 0: Mailing list: hg-git@googlegroups.com Archives: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/hg-git Pull requests are generally not noticed more than once every few months. If you do a pull request, I'm still going to expect you to have a clean history, and to be willing to rework history so it's clean before I push the "merge" button.