view scripts/special-matrix/invhilb.m @ 20331:0b9d23557506

gallery: fix randsvd by adding missing dependency qmult(). * scripts/special-matrix/gallery.m (randsvd) was copied from the Test Matrix toolbox by Nicholas J. Higham. It made use of qmult() which was also part of that toolbox but was left behind. This qmult() implementation is also recovered from the Test Matrix toolbox. Note that Octave itself used to have qmult() which is part of the legacy quaternion package (now also removed from the new quaternion package). See cset 21904fe299c8 for when qmult() was removed from Octave. Also fix the default value for KL and KU so that a 2 element vector can be used as N.
author Carnë Draug <carandraug@octave.org>
date Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:18:33 +0100
parents b0f7ee81d974
children
line wrap: on
line source

## Copyright (C) 1993-2015 Dirk Laurie
##
## This file is part of Octave.
##
## Octave is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
## under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
## the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at
## your option) any later version.
##
## Octave is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
## WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
## MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
## General Public License for more details.
##
## You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
## along with Octave; see the file COPYING.  If not, see
## <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

## -*- texinfo -*-
## @deftypefn {Function File} {} invhilb (@var{n})
## Return the inverse of the Hilbert matrix of order @var{n}.
##
## This can be computed exactly using
## @tex
## $$\eqalign{
##   A_{ij} &= -1^{i+j} (i+j-1)
##              \left( \matrix{n+i-1 \cr n-j } \right)
##              \left( \matrix{n+j-1 \cr n-i } \right)
##              \left( \matrix{i+j-2 \cr i-2 } \right)^2 \cr
##          &= { p(i)p(j) \over (i+j-1) }
## }$$
## where
## $$
##   p(k) = -1^k \left( \matrix{ k+n-1 \cr k-1 } \right)
##               \left( \matrix{ n \cr k } \right)
## $$
## @end tex
## @ifnottex
##
## @example
## @group
##
##            (i+j)         /n+i-1\  /n+j-1\   /i+j-2\ 2
## A(i,j) = -1      (i+j-1)(       )(       ) (       )
##                          \ n-j /  \ n-i /   \ i-2 /
##
##        = p(i) p(j) / (i+j-1)
##
## @end group
## @end example
##
## @noindent
## where
##
## @example
## @group
##          k  /k+n-1\   /n\
## p(k) = -1  (       ) (   )
##             \ k-1 /   \k/
## @end group
## @end example
##
## @end ifnottex
## The validity of this formula can easily be checked by expanding the binomial
## coefficients in both formulas as factorials.  It can be derived more
## directly via the theory of Cauchy matrices.  See @nospell{J. W. Demmel},
## @cite{Applied Numerical Linear Algebra}, p. 92.
##
## Compare this with the numerical calculation of @code{inverse (hilb (n))},
## which suffers from the ill-conditioning of the Hilbert matrix, and the
## finite precision of your computer's floating point arithmetic.
## @seealso{hilb}
## @end deftypefn

## Author: Dirk Laurie <dlaurie@na-net.ornl.gov>

function retval = invhilb (n)

  if (nargin != 1)
    print_usage ();
  elseif (! isscalar (n))
    error ("invhilb: N must be a scalar integer");
  endif

  ## The point about the second formula above is that when vectorized,
  ## p(k) is evaluated for k=1:n which involves O(n) calls to bincoeff
  ## instead of O(n^2).
  ##
  ## We evaluate the expression as (-1)^(i+j)*(p(i)*p(j))/(i+j-1) except
  ## when p(i)*p(j) would overflow.  In cases where p(i)*p(j) is an exact
  ## machine number, the result is also exact.  Otherwise we calculate
  ## (-1)^(i+j)*p(i)*(p(j)/(i+j-1)).
  ##
  ## The Octave bincoeff routine uses transcendental functions (gammaln
  ## and exp) rather than multiplications, for the sake of speed.
  ## However, it rounds the answer to the nearest integer, which
  ## justifies the claim about exactness made above.

  retval = zeros (n);
  k = [1:n];
  p = k .* bincoeff (k+n-1, k-1) .* bincoeff (n, k);
  p(2:2:n) = -p(2:2:n);
  if (n < 203)
    for l = 1:n
      retval(l,:) = (p(l) * p) ./ [l:l+n-1];
    endfor
  else
    for l = 1:n
      retval(l,:) = p(l) * (p ./ [l:l+n-1]);
    endfor
  endif

endfunction


%!assert (invhilb (1), 1)
%!assert (invhilb (2), [4, -6; -6, 12])
%!test
%! result4 = [16  , -120 , 240  , -140;
%!            -120, 1200 , -2700, 1680;
%!            240 , -2700, 6480 , -4200;
%!            -140, 1680 , -4200, 2800];
%! assert (invhilb (4), result4);
%!assert (invhilb (7) * hilb (7), eye (7), sqrt (eps))

%!error invhilb ()
%!error invhilb (1, 2)
%!error <N must be a scalar integer> invhilb ([1, 2])