Mercurial > octave
diff m4/prog_c.m4 @ 21304:0cf6c08cb252
configure.ac: check support for C11 and C++11 (patch #8906)
* configure.ac: two new checks for support of C++11 and C11 versions of
the standard and to add required flags to CXX and CC. These need to
be done before AC_PROG_CPP and AC_PROG_CXXPP since the later will
make use of the defined CXX and CC.
* m4/prog_c.m4, m4/prog_cxx.m4: added files for OCTAVE_PROG_CC_C11 and
OCTAVE_PROG_CXX_CXX11 which are copied from autoconf source tree
implementations of _AC_PROG_CC_C11 and _AC_PROG_CXX_CXX11.
author | Carnë Draug <carandraug@octave.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:20:49 +0000 |
parents | |
children | 822dc5a202c9 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/m4/prog_c.m4 Thu Feb 18 16:20:49 2016 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,276 @@ +# Copyright (C) 2001-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# +# +# This is pretty much copy and paste of the unreleased autoconf macros +# (where it is named AC_PROG_CXX_CXX11). Once we are dependent on +# autoconf version with that macro, we can simply change to use that +# one instead. Copied from autoconf commit 04be2b7a (2016/02/06) +# +# +# This file is part of Autoconf. This program is free +# software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the +# terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the +# Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or +# (at your option) any later version. +# +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +# GNU General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +# along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. + +# OCTAVE_PROG_CC_C11 ([ACTION-IF-AVAILABLE], [ACTION-IF-UNAVAILABLE]) +# ---------------------------------------------------------------- +# If the C compiler is not in ISO C11 mode by default, try to add an +# option to output variable CC to make it so. This macro tries +# various options that select ISO C11 on some system or another. It +# considers the compiler to be in ISO C11 mode if it handles _Alignas, +# _Alignof, _Noreturn, _Static_assert, UTF-8 string literals, +# duplicate typedefs, and anonymous structures and unions. +AC_DEFUN([OCTAVE_PROG_CC_C11], +[_OCTAVE_C_STD_TRY([c11], +[_OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_HEADER[ +// Check _Alignas. +char _Alignas (double) aligned_as_double; +char _Alignas (0) no_special_alignment; +extern char aligned_as_int; +char _Alignas (0) _Alignas (int) aligned_as_int; + +// Check _Alignof. +enum +{ + int_alignment = _Alignof (int), + int_array_alignment = _Alignof (int[100]), + char_alignment = _Alignof (char) +}; +_Static_assert (0 < -_Alignof (int), "_Alignof is signed"); + +// Check _Noreturn. +int _Noreturn does_not_return (void) { for (;;) continue; } + +// Check _Static_assert. +struct test_static_assert +{ + int x; + _Static_assert (sizeof (int) <= sizeof (long int), + "_Static_assert does not work in struct"); + long int y; +}; + +// Check UTF-8 literals. +#define u8 syntax error! +char const utf8_literal[] = u8"happens to be ASCII" "another string"; + +// Check duplicate typedefs. +typedef long *long_ptr; +typedef long int *long_ptr; +typedef long_ptr long_ptr; + +// Anonymous structures and unions -- taken from C11 6.7.2.1 Example 1. +struct anonymous +{ + union { + struct { int i; int j; }; + struct { int k; long int l; } w; + }; + int m; +} v1; +]], +[_OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_BODY[ + v1.i = 2; + v1.w.k = 5; + _Static_assert (&v1.i == &v1.w.k, "Anonymous union alignment botch"); +]], +dnl Try +dnl GCC -std=gnu11 (unused restrictive mode: -std=c11) +dnl with extended modes being tried first. +dnl +dnl Do not try -qlanglvl=extc1x, because IBM XL C V12.1 (the latest version as +dnl of September 2012) does not pass the C11 test. For now, try extc1x when +dnl compiling the C99 test instead, since it enables _Static_assert and +dnl _Noreturn, which is a win. If -qlanglvl=extc11 or -qlanglvl=extc1x passes +dnl the C11 test in some future version of IBM XL C, we'll add it here, +dnl preferably extc11. +[[-std=gnu11]], [$1], [$2])[]dnl +])# OCTAVE_PROG_CC_C11 + + +# _OCTAVE_C_STD_TRY(STANDARD, TEST-PROLOGUE, TEST-BODY, OPTION-LIST, +# ACTION-IF-AVAILABLE, ACTION-IF-UNAVAILABLE) +# -------------------------------------------------------------- +# Check whether the C compiler accepts features of STANDARD (e.g `c89', `c99') +# by trying to compile a program of TEST-PROLOGUE and TEST-BODY. If this fails, +# try again with each compiler option in the space-separated OPTION-LIST; if one +# helps, append it to CC. If eventually successful, run ACTION-IF-AVAILABLE, +# else ACTION-IF-UNAVAILABLE. +AC_DEFUN([_OCTAVE_C_STD_TRY], +[AC_MSG_CHECKING([for $CC option to enable ]m4_translit($1, [c], [C])[ features]) +AC_CACHE_VAL(ac_cv_prog_cc_$1, +[ac_cv_prog_cc_$1=no +ac_save_CC=$CC +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([$2], [$3])]) +for ac_arg in '' $4 +do + CC="$ac_save_CC $ac_arg" + _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([], [ac_cv_prog_cc_$1=$ac_arg]) + test "x$ac_cv_prog_cc_$1" != "xno" && break +done +rm -f conftest.$ac_ext +CC=$ac_save_CC +])# AC_CACHE_VAL +ac_prog_cc_stdc_options= +case "x$ac_cv_prog_cc_$1" in + x) + AC_MSG_RESULT([none needed]) ;; + xno) + AC_MSG_RESULT([unsupported]) ;; + *) + ac_prog_cc_stdc_options=" $ac_cv_prog_cc_$1" + CC=$CC$ac_prog_cc_stdc_options + AC_MSG_RESULT([$ac_cv_prog_cc_$1]) ;; +esac +AS_IF([test "x$ac_cv_prog_cc_$1" != xno], [$5], [$6]) +])# _OCTAVE_C_STD_TRY + +# _OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_HEADER +# --------------------- +# A C header suitable for testing for C99. +AC_DEFUN([_OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_HEADER], +[[#include <stdarg.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <wchar.h> +#include <stdio.h> + +// Check varargs macros. These examples are taken from C99 6.10.3.5. +#define debug(...) fprintf (stderr, __VA_ARGS__) +#define showlist(...) puts (#__VA_ARGS__) +#define report(test,...) ((test) ? puts (#test) : printf (__VA_ARGS__)) +static void +test_varargs_macros (void) +{ + int x = 1234; + int y = 5678; + debug ("Flag"); + debug ("X = %d\n", x); + showlist (The first, second, and third items.); + report (x>y, "x is %d but y is %d", x, y); +} + +// Check long long types. +#define BIG64 18446744073709551615ull +#define BIG32 4294967295ul +#define BIG_OK (BIG64 / BIG32 == 4294967297ull && BIG64 % BIG32 == 0) +#if !BIG_OK + your preprocessor is broken; +#endif +#if BIG_OK +#else + your preprocessor is broken; +#endif +static long long int bignum = -9223372036854775807LL; +static unsigned long long int ubignum = BIG64; + +struct incomplete_array +{ + int datasize; + double data[]; +}; + +struct named_init { + int number; + const wchar_t *name; + double average; +}; + +typedef const char *ccp; + +static inline int +test_restrict (ccp restrict text) +{ + // See if C++-style comments work. + // Iterate through items via the restricted pointer. + // Also check for declarations in for loops. + for (unsigned int i = 0; *(text+i) != '\0'; ++i) + continue; + return 0; +} + +// Check varargs and va_copy. +static bool +test_varargs (const char *format, ...) +{ + va_list args; + va_start (args, format); + va_list args_copy; + va_copy (args_copy, args); + + const char *str = ""; + int number = 0; + float fnumber = 0; + + while (*format) + { + switch (*format++) + { + case 's': // string + str = va_arg (args_copy, const char *); + break; + case 'd': // int + number = va_arg (args_copy, int); + break; + case 'f': // float + fnumber = va_arg (args_copy, double); + break; + default: + break; + } + } + va_end (args_copy); + va_end (args); + + return *str && number && fnumber; +}]])# _OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_HEADER + +# _OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_BODY +# ------------------- +# A C body suitable for testing for C99, assuming the corresponding header. +AC_DEFUN([_OCTAVE_C_C99_TEST_BODY], +[[ + // Check bool. + _Bool success = false; + + // Check restrict. + if (test_restrict ("String literal") == 0) + success = true; + char *restrict newvar = "Another string"; + + // Check varargs. + success &= test_varargs ("s, d' f .", "string", 65, 34.234); + test_varargs_macros (); + + // Check flexible array members. + struct incomplete_array *ia = + malloc (sizeof (struct incomplete_array) + (sizeof (double) * 10)); + ia->datasize = 10; + for (int i = 0; i < ia->datasize; ++i) + ia->data[i] = i * 1.234; + + // Check named initializers. + struct named_init ni = { + .number = 34, + .name = L"Test wide string", + .average = 543.34343, + }; + + ni.number = 58; + + int dynamic_array[ni.number]; + dynamic_array[ni.number - 1] = 543; + + // work around unused variable warnings + return (!success || bignum == 0LL || ubignum == 0uLL || newvar[0] == 'x' + || dynamic_array[ni.number - 1] != 543); +]])